What is the goal of analytic scoring when evaluating written work?

The goal of analytic scoring when evaluating written work is to use a description of major features for assessment. This method breaks down the evaluation into specific criteria, allowing educators to assess various aspects of writing separately, such as organization, content, style, and mechanics. By focusing on distinct components, analytic scoring provides a more detailed and structured approach to feedback, which can highlight strengths and areas for improvement in a student's writing.

This detailed feedback is particularly beneficial in educational settings, as it helps students understand not just their overall performance, but also the specific areas where they excel or need further development. Such an approach promotes a more comprehensive understanding of the writing process and encourages growth through targeted improvements.

In contrast, some of the other methods mentioned may not provide the same level of detailed feedback. For example, providing a numerical score based on overall impression would yield a more general evaluation without delving into the individual elements of writing. Focusing solely on grammar and punctuation would overlook other critical factors such as content and coherence. Lastly, including only subjective observations from a single rater could introduce bias and lack the consistency that analytic scoring aims to achieve.